Stephens v. Department of Corrections
This text of Stephens v. Department of Corrections (Stephens v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-0380 _____________________________
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS,
Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
November 29, 2023
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So. 3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing the petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had given the petitioner a ruling on the pending pleading below).
ROBERTS, KELSEY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
David Terrance Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.
Charles T. Martin, Jr., Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephens v. Department of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-department-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2023.