Stephens v. Coon

177 So. 191, 130 Fla. 42, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 810
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 177 So. 191 (Stephens v. Coon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Coon, 177 So. 191, 130 Fla. 42, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 810 (Fla. 1937).

Opinion

Buford, J.

In a suit instituted January 30th, 1936, to foreclose a mortgage executed the 5th day of January, 1926, to secure the payment of $2,000.00 balance of purchase price and on which there was a balance due on principal in the sum of $450.00, with interest at 8% per annum from Jan *43 uary 4th, 1928, defendant filed answer embracing counterclaim and praying affirmative relief. Defendant alleged that he had paid $2,550.00 on the agreed purchase price of $3,000.00 of the property involved. . It was then alleged:

“Defendant further avers' that he was induced to purchase said property by the representation of one Earl Beeler, who was appointed exclusive sales agent for Enchanted Isles, by a deed of trust executed on the 4th day of February, A. D. 1924, by and between Francis A Curry, joined by his wife, Gertrude Curry, therein called the Trustors,. First National Company of Sarasota therein called the Trustee, and Earl Beeler therein referred to as' the Developer, a copy of which Trust Agreement is hereto attached as Exhibit ‘A’ and made-a part hereof as though pleaded in extenso; that it was represented to the defendant by the said Earl Beeler in selling said property that financial arrangements had been made and sufficient finances provided to develop the said property id the following respects:

“1. To build a sea wall in and about said property not less than 9,910 feet in length.

“2. To construct canals according to plat of said property to such a depth as to carry 3J4 feet of water at low tide.

“3. To build sidewalks in front of all lots, said sidewalks to be constructed of concrete and to border on the lot .purchased by the defendant.

“4. To pave all streets adjacent to the canal to a width of not less than 20 feet.

“5. To construct bridges in and about said property and over said canals and to make fills wherever required to bring all of the said property up to the level of the highest point of said purported development.

*44 “And defendant avers that he relied upon said premises and representations' made to him in purchasing said lot or parcel of land and did purchase the same as hereinabove set forth and described. And defendant further avers that 'none of said premises and representations on the part of the said Earl Beeler, acting in the capacity aforesaid and within the terms of said Trust Indenture have been carried out or performed and he avers that the representations made to him with respect to the ability to finance the development and the plans and the fact that sufficient money had been provided and the finances arranged to develop said property as promised and represented, were false and known to be false at the time defendant was induced by virtue thereof to purchase said property.

“Third.

“Defendant further avers that the First Trust Company of Sarasota as successor in Trust to the First National Company of Sarasota, is a necessary party to this proceeding by virtue of the deed from the First National Company of Sarasota to this defendant.

“Fourth.

“Defendants further aver that the plaintiff in this cause, P. R. Coon, acquired the mortgage and note sought to be foreclosed in this action after maturity thereof burdened with all defenses which this defendant might or could have against the original payee therein.

“Forasmuch, therefore, as the defendants are without remedy in the premises except in a Court of Equity where such matters are cognizable and relievable, these defendants pray:

*45 "I.

“That the deed from First National Company of Sarasota to the defendant, W. E. Stephens, Jr., be canceled and set aside.

“II.

“That the mortgage and note sought to be foreclosed in this action be canceled and that the defendant, W. E. Stephens, Jr., have a Vendee’s lien in the sum of Twenty-five Hundred Fifty and No/100 ($2,550.00) Dollars with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from January 5th, 1926, against the property described in this' action.”

Exhibit “A,” which is in terms made a part- of the answer, contains the following provisions:

“This Indenture, Made and executed * this 4th day of February, A. D. 1924, by and between Francis A. Curry, joined by his wife, Gertrude A. Curry, of Sarasota County, Florida (hereinafter called the Trustors), and First National Company of Sarasota, a corporation having its principal .place of business in Sarasota County, Florida (hereinafter called the Trustee), and Earl Beeler of Sarasota County, Florida (hereinafter called the Developer),

“Witnesseth i Whereas, the said Francis A. Curry and Gertrude A. Curry were, until the date of the execution of these .presents, the owners' of the following described real estate located in Sarasota County, Florida, to-wit:

“United States Government Lot Six of Section One, Township Thirty-nine South, Range Eighteen East; and,

“Whereas, said Developer has subdivided or intends shortly to subdivide said land into lots' and blocks and thereupon improve, develop and sell the same, said subdivision to be known as ‘Enchanted Isles,’ and,

“Whereas, to facilitate the carrying out of said project it is necessary that a Trustee be appointed to receive and *46 distribute these funds, hold the legal title to said land and make conveyances as sales are effective, receive the proceeds of sale and account therefor, and otherwise attend the fiscal details involved; and that a Developer should be designated to1 find purchasers for said land and to supervise the work of developing s'ame: '

“Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises and of the stipulations hereinafter set out, the said Trustors and Developer each with the others and they jointly with the Trustee do covenant and agree:

“(A). That the Developer shall perform the following duties in reference to this agreement:

“(1) He shall proceed to improve said property in the following manner:

“(a) He shall construct around said property at wherever the same may be required, a seawall to be built of pecky cypress according to plat;, said seawall when completed shall be not less than Nine Thousand, Nine Hundred and Ten feet in length. However, it is distinctly understood that the parties to this agreement may mutually extend or limit said seawall except, however, that the seawall shall in no case be limited beyond that which is shown on said plat.

“(b) The Developer shall .construct on said land all canals as shown by the plat of said property, said canals shall be approximately sixty feet wide with approximately forty feet of water in the clear at low tide, said canals' shall be dredged to such depths as will carry three and one-half feet of water at low tide.

“(c) Sidewalks shall be constructed in front of all lots as shown on said plat, said sidewalks shall be made of concrete.

“(d) The Developer shall proceed to pave all streets ad *47

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. Pullum
198 So. 2d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Cape Cod Trust Co. v. Wixon
143 So. 2d 339 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Baxter v. Thompson
184 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 So. 191, 130 Fla. 42, 1937 Fla. LEXIS 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-coon-fla-1937.