Stephens v. Beldock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stephens v. Beldock

135 A.D.2d 807, 523 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52737

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 28, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.2d 807 (Stephens v. Beldock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. Beldock, 135 A.D.2d 807, 523 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from rescinding an order of a Judge of coordinate jurisdiction directing a hearing on the testimonial capacity of a complainant in a criminal case, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 22, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Finnegan in the Supreme Court.

We add that the Court of Appeals has recently held that even if an alleged error of constitutional dimension may be involved, prohibition does not lie because the issue would be reviewable upon direct appeal (Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit the respondent from rescinding an order of a Judge of coordinate jurisdiction directing a hearing on the testimonial capacity of a complainant in a criminal case, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 22, 1987, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Finnegan in the Supreme Court.

We add that the Court of Appeals has recently held that even if an alleged error of constitutional dimension may be involved, prohibition does not lie because the issue would be reviewable upon direct appeal (Matter of Lipari v Owens, 70 NY2d 731). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 807, 523 N.Y.S.2d 26, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-beldock-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack