Stephens-Adamson Manufacturing Co. v. Armstrong
This text of 91 A. 924 (Stephens-Adamson Manufacturing Co. v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statement of the question involved is “Did the plaintiff waive its right to move for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense by entering a rule on the defendant to plead, and plea filed in pursuance thereof?” This question has been decided adversely to the appellant in the recent case of Dreifus v. Logan Iron Co., 245 Pa. 196. It is the only question on which the appellant is entitled to be heard. Lincoln v. Wakefield, 237 Pa. 97; Felin v. Philadelphia, 241 Pa. 164, and cases there cited.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A. 924, 245 Pa. 552, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-adamson-manufacturing-co-v-armstrong-pa-1914.