Stephen W. Carlson v. American Express

409 F. App'x 976
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 14, 2011·No. 09-3552·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

During the pendency of this appeal from the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing Stephen Carlson’s complaint and imposing sanctions against him, Carlson reached a settlement with all but one of the appellees, and those appellees have been dismissed. Because Carlson has not challenged in his appellate brief the district court’s dismissal of his action against the only remaining appellee, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.2004) (issues not briefed are deemed abandoned), we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephen W. Carlson v. American Express, 409 F. App'x 976 (8th Cir. 2011).

409 F. App'x 976 (Stephen W. Carlson v. American Express) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carlson v. American Express
181 L. Ed. 2d 125 (Supreme Court, 2011)