Stephen W. Carlson v. American Express
This text of 409 F. App'x 976 (Stephen W. Carlson v. American Express) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
During the pendency of this appeal from the district court’s 1 judgment dismissing Stephen Carlson’s complaint and imposing sanctions against him, Carlson reached a settlement with all but one of the appellees, and those appellees have been dismissed. Because Carlson has not challenged in his appellate brief the district court’s dismissal of his action against the only remaining appellee, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights, see Griffith v. City of Des Moines, 387 F.3d 733, 739 (8th Cir.2004) (issues not briefed are deemed abandoned), we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Michael J. Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F. App'x 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-w-carlson-v-american-express-ca8-2011.