Stephen Starr v. The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 15, 2024
Docket2023-1800
StatusPublished

This text of Stephen Starr v. The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc. (Stephen Starr v. The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephen Starr v. The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 15, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1800 ________________

Stephen Starr, Appellant,

vs.

The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc., Appellee.

An Appeal from the School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida.

Stephen Starr, in proper person.

Sean Fahey (West Palm Beach), for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Perry v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 220 So. 3d 546,

549-50 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (noting that “when actions undertaken by a Florida administrative agency affect one’s ‘substantial interests’, the affected

person is entitled to an administrative hearing.”) See also Schs. Bd. of Palm

Beach Cnty. v. Survivors Charter Schs., Inc., 3 So. 3d 1220, 1231 (Fla. 2009)

(noting that a school board is an “agency” as defined in Chapter 120,

Administrative Procedure Act, and that Chapter 120 applies generally to a

school board’s decision making); Herold v. Univ. of So. Fla., 806 So. 2d 638

(Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (professor’s substantial interests were not affected by

University’s decision to deny him a tenured professorship, noting “case law

makes it clear that a substantial interest is one based on a legal entitlement,

and not on a mere unilateral expectation”) (citing Fertally v. Miami-Dade

Cmty. Coll., 651 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (holding nonrenewal of

professor’s annual contract did not affect her substantial interests for

purposes of section 120.57)) (additional citations omitted); Jones v. Miami-

Dade Cnty. Public Schs., 816 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding no

substantial interest entitling school administrator to hearing where his annual

contract was not renewed).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fertally v. Miami-Dade Community College
651 So. 2d 1283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
School Board of Palm Beach County v. Survivors Charter Schools, Inc.
3 So. 3d 1220 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Herold v. University of South Florida
806 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Jones v. Miami-Dade County
816 So. 2d 824 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Perry v. Department of Children & Families
220 So. 3d 546 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stephen Starr v. The School District of Palm Beach County Public Schools, etc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-starr-v-the-school-district-of-palm-beach-county-public-schools-fladistctapp-2024.