Stephen Pete on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950

517 F.2d 1274
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1974
Docket73-1270
StatusPublished

This text of 517 F.2d 1274 (Stephen Pete on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephen Pete on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Intervenors v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, Slimp Kiser, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated v. United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950, 517 F.2d 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1974).

Opinion

517 F.2d 1274

170 U.S.App.D.C. 444

Stephen PETE on behalf of himself and all others similarly
situated, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors,
v.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND
OF 1950 et al., Appellants.
Slimp KISER, on behalf of himself and all other similarly
situated plaintiffs, et al.
v.
UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA WELFARE AND RETIREMENT FUND
OF 1950, et al., Appellants.

Nos. 73-1270, 73-1393.

United States Court of Appeals
District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 2, 1974.

On Petition for Rehearing En Banc of --- U.S.App.D.C. ---, 517 F.2d 1237, --- U.S.App.D.C. ---, 517 F.2d 1267.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and WRIGHT, McGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKINNON, ROBB and WILKEY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the "Petition for Rehearing En Banc" and the "Petition for Rehearing and/or Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc", it is

Ordered by the Court en banc that the above entitled cases shall be reheard by the Court sitting en banc at 2:00 P.M. Wednesday, October 23, 1974.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kiser v. Huge
517 F.2d 1237 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
517 F.2d 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-pete-on-behalf-of-himself-and-all-others-similarly-situated-cadc-1974.