Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
This text of Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-25-00328-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
STEPHEN PAUL CARRIGAN, Appellant,
v.
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no
longer wishes to pursue this appeal.
The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should
be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R.
42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained.
YSMAEL D. FONSECA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 31st day of July, 2025.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-paul-carrigan-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-2025.