Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Opinion
NUMBER 13-25-00328-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
STEPHEN PAUL CARRIGAN, Appellant, v.
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no longer wishes to pursue this appeal.
The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted,
and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained.
YSMAEL D. FONSECA
Justice
Delivered and filed on the 31st day of July, 2025.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.