Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 31, 2025
Docket13-25-00328-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-25-00328-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

STEPHEN PAUL CARRIGAN, Appellant,

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee.

ON APPEAL FROM THE 148TH DISTRICT COURT OF NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca Memorandum Opinion by Justice Fonseca

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant no

longer wishes to pursue this appeal.

The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should

be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed. The costs are taxed against the appellant. See id. R.

42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained.

YSMAEL D. FONSECA Justice

Delivered and filed on the 31st day of July, 2025.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stephen Paul Carrigan v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-paul-carrigan-v-commission-for-lawyer-discipline-texapp-2025.