Stephen Musilino v. Alabama Marble Co., Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
• Decided: January 19, 2016
• Docket: 15-13733
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 15-13733 Date Filed: 01/19/2016 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 15-13733 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket Nos. 1:15-cv-00053-RDP; 14-bkc-40157-JJR11

In re: ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC.,

Debtor. __________________________________________________________________

STEPHEN MUSILINO, SYCAMORE MARBLE COMPANY, INC., MEDITERRANEAN EXPORTS, INC.,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ALABAMA MARBLE CO., INC., BLUE DEVIL INVESTMENTS, INC., DAVID LUCE, CREDIT STRATEGY ADVISORS, INC., TBGS QUARRY, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees. Case: 15-13733 Date Filed: 01/19/2016 Page: 2 of 2

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ________________________

(January 19, 2016)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After an independent review of the record, we affirm the District Court’s

July 20, 2015, order denying Appellants’ appeal from the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama. Appellants challenge a

settlement agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court, asking that this Court

effectively undo all or part of that agreement. As the District Court properly held,

the appellants’ claims must be denied on equitable mootness grounds. See

Musilino v. Ala. Marble Co. Inc., 534 B.R. 820 (N.D. Ala. 2015). As such, we

affirm the District Court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.