STEPHEN MURRAY v. JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR

District Court of Appeal of Florida

STEPHEN MURRAY v. JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 9, 2021

Docket21-2586

StatusPublished

This text of STEPHEN MURRAY v. JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR (STEPHEN MURRAY v. JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

STEPHEN MURRAY v. JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STEPHEN MURRAY, Appellant,

v.

JANELLE IRWIN TAYLOR, an individual, PETER D. SCHORSCH, an individual, and EXTENSIVE ENTERPRISES MEDIA, a Florida LLC, Appellees.

No. 4D21-2586

[December 9, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Rebecca I. White, Judge; L.T. Case No. 21CA000035CAAXMX.

Stephen Murray, Okeechobee, appellant.

Mark Herron of Messer Caparello, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, KLINGENSMITH and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI