Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
This text of Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young (Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN MORRIS; KELLY No. 13-16599 MCDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others D.C. No. similarly situated, 5:12-cv-04964-RMW Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. OPINION
ERNST & YOUNG, LLP; ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP, Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed July 9, 2018
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Sandra S. Ikuta and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion 2 MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated May 21, 2018, the opinion of this Court dated August 22, 2016, 834 F.3d 975 is VACATED and judgment is entered AFFIRMING the district court’s grant of Defendant- Appellees’ motion to compel arbitration.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-morris-v-ernst-young-ca9-2018.