Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 9, 2018
Docket13-16599
StatusPublished

This text of Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young (Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young, (9th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN MORRIS; KELLY No. 13-16599 MCDANIEL, on behalf of themselves and all others D.C. No. similarly situated, 5:12-cv-04964-RMW Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. OPINION

ERNST & YOUNG, LLP; ERNST & YOUNG U.S., LLP, Defendants-Appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed July 9, 2018

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Sandra S. Ikuta and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion 2 MORRIS V. ERNST & YOUNG

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion dated May 21, 2018, the opinion of this Court dated August 22, 2016, 834 F.3d 975 is VACATED and judgment is entered AFFIRMING the district court’s grant of Defendant- Appellees’ motion to compel arbitration.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young
834 F.3d 975 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stephen Morris v. Ernst & Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-morris-v-ernst-young-ca9-2018.