Stephen Moore v. Harlan Bockman, John E. Popovich, and Lucinda Bruner
This text of 953 F.2d 1391 (Stephen Moore v. Harlan Bockman, John E. Popovich, and Lucinda Bruner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
953 F.2d 1391
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
Stephen MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Harlan BOCKMAN, John E. Popovich, and Lucinda Bruner,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-1343.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Feb. 4, 1992.
Before SEYMOUR, STEPHEN H. ANDERSON and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.*
ORDER AND JUDGMENT**
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Stephen Moore appeals from an order entered August 26, 1991, dismissing his civil rights complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his notice of appeal on September 30, 1991, five days past the thirty-day time limit set forth in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1). Moreover, plaintiff did not move for an extension of time as provided by Rule 4(a)(5). A timely filed notice of appeal is "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). We therefore DISMISS the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
953 F.2d 1391, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9236, 1992 WL 21312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-moore-v-harlan-bockman-john-e-popovich-and-ca10-1992.