Stephen M. Partin v. Dr. Young
This text of 49 F. App'x 85 (Stephen M. Partin v. Dr. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Arkansas inmate Stephen M. Partin appeals the district court’s * dismissal without prejudice of Partin’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 denial-of-medical-care lawsuit. Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Partin failed to exhaust available prison administrative remedies for all his claims. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Graves v. Norris, 218 F.3d 884, 885-86 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable John F. Forster, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 F. App'x 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-m-partin-v-dr-young-ca8-2002.