Stephen Lyttle v. Attorney Grievance Commission
This text of Stephen Lyttle v. Attorney Grievance Commission (Stephen Lyttle v. Attorney Grievance Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
March 28, 2014 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman 148211 Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano, STEPHEN LYTTLE, Justices Plaintiff, v SC: 148211 AGC: 2195-13 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 28, 2014 s0324 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen Lyttle v. Attorney Grievance Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-lyttle-v-attorney-grievance-commission-mich-2014.