Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company
This text of Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company (Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 25, 2013
NO. 03-13-00224-CV
Stephen J. Seavall, Appellant
v.
The Cadle Company, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR
THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court being of the opinion that
it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed for want
of jurisdiction: IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs
relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified
below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-j-seavall-v-the-cadle-company-texapp-2013.