Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 25, 2013·No. 03-13-00224-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 25, 2013

NO. 03-13-00224-CV

Stephen J. Seavall, Appellant

v.

The Cadle Company, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court being of the opinion that

it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal should therefore be dismissed for want

of jurisdiction: IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company (Stephen J. Seavall v. the Cadle Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.