Stephen J. Harper v. Spencer & Associates, P.C.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stephen J. Harper v. Spencer & Associates, P.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8099 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2014·No. 01-13-00706-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Case number: 01-13-00706-CV

Style: Stephen J. Harper, Appellant v. Spencer & Associates, P.C., Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing en banc

Party filing motion: Appellant

The court, having voted against rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting for the Court

Before: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: October 21, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Case number: 01-13-00706-CV

Style: Stephen J. Harper, Appellant v. Spencer & Associates, P.C., Appellee

Type of motion: Motion for rehearing en banc

Party filing motion: Appellant

The court, having voted against rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting for the Court

Before: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: October 21, 2014

Stephen J. Harper v. Spencer & Associates, P.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Stephen J. Harper v. Spencer & Associates, P.C. (Stephen J. Harper v. Spencer & Associates, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.