Stephen Fox v. Mirna Azucena Alberto (Perez)
This text of Stephen Fox v. Mirna Azucena Alberto (Perez) (Stephen Fox v. Mirna Azucena Alberto (Perez)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Permissive Appeal Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 28, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-12-00539-CV
STEPHEN FOX, Appellant
V.
MIRNA AZUCENA ALBERTO (PEREZ), Appellee
On Appeal from the 257th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009-54595
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 11, 2012, appellant Stephen Fox filed a petition for permissive appeal in this court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 2011); see also Tex. R. App. P. 28.3. In the petition, appellant asked this court to review the interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion to recuse.
Appellant has not established that he is entitled to a permissive appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(a) (requiring permission from the trial court to appeal interlocutory order). Accordingly, we deny appellant’s petition for permissive appeal.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen Fox v. Mirna Azucena Alberto (Perez), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-fox-v-mirna-azucena-alberto-perez-texapp-2012.