Stephen D. Wright and E&M ERS, Inc. v. Lacy Branch
This text of Stephen D. Wright and E&M ERS, Inc. v. Lacy Branch (Stephen D. Wright and E&M ERS, Inc. v. Lacy Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
STEPHEN D. WRIGHT AND NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO E&M ERS, INC., FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Petitioners, CASE NO. 1D14-3044 v.
LACY BRANCH,
Respondent. ___________________________/
Opinion filed August 1, 2014.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.
Brentt E. Palmer of Young, Bill, Roumbos & Boles, P.A., Pensacola, for Petitioner, Stephen D. Wright.
No appearance for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks certiorari review of an order denying his motion to stay
discovery. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that he will be irreparably harmed by
the order denying stay as the order does not compel discovery. Accordingly, the
petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephen D. Wright and E&M ERS, Inc. v. Lacy Branch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-d-wright-and-em-ers-inc-v-lacy-branch-fladistctapp-2014.