Stephen Antonio Hawkins v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 7, 2016
Docket15-0368
StatusPublished

This text of Stephen Antonio Hawkins v. State of Florida (Stephen Antonio Hawkins v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephen Antonio Hawkins v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

STEPHEN ANTONIO NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO HAWKINS, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D15-0368 v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 8, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm this appeal in all respects, but write to address the trial court’s

imposition of the $100 Sheriff’s Investigatory Costs. The appellant filed a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) motion challenging the imposition of the

costs where there was no record indication that the agency had requested them, and

the State concedes error. While the trial court eventually entered an order partially

granting the appellant’s motion and striking the costs, the order and the amended

judgment and sentence were filed more than sixty days from the date the appellant

filed his motion. As such, the order and corrected judgment and sentence are legal

nullities. See Ogden v. State, 117 So. 3d 479, 480 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).

We affirm the appellant’s conviction and sentence, but remand for entry of a

corrected judgment and sentence striking the $100 Sheriff’s Investigatory Costs.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ogden v. State
117 So. 3d 479 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stephen Antonio Hawkins v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephen-antonio-hawkins-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.