Stephan Fleming v. Michael J. Astrue

496 F. App'x 693
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2013
Docket12-2196
StatusUnpublished

This text of 496 F. App'x 693 (Stephan Fleming v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephan Fleming v. Michael J. Astrue, 496 F. App'x 693 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Stephan A. Fleming appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Upon de novo review, see Clarinda Home Health v. Shalala, 100 F.3d 526, 528 (8th Cir.1996), we agree with the district court that there was no constructive or de facto reopening of Fleming’s earlier application, and thus that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking, see *694 King v. Chater, 90 F.3d 323, 325 (8th Cir. 1996). The district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 F. App'x 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephan-fleming-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2013.