Stephaine Espinosa v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
Docket07-06-00043-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Stephaine Espinosa v. State (Stephaine Espinosa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephaine Espinosa v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

NO. 07-06-0043-CR
NO. 07-06-0044-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL C


MARCH 8, 2006



______________________________


STEPHANIE LINDA ESPINOSA,


Appellant



v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,


Appellee



_________________________________


FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;


NOS. 50,641-C & 50,642-C; HON. PATRICK A. PIRTLE, PRESIDING


_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and HANCOCK, JJ.

Stephanie Linda Espinosa, appellant, attempts to appeal her convictions for possession of a controlled substance in a drug free zone. The court imposed her sentence in both causes in open court on December 12, 2005. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal in both cases on January 30, 2006. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). No motion for new trial having been filed, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed January 11, 2006. Because the record discloses that appellant's notice of appeal was received by the trial court clerk on January 30, 2006, in both cases, without seeking an extension of the deadline, Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, the notices of appeal were late.

A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notices being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matters and dismiss the appeals.

Accordingly, appellant's appeals are dismissed. (1)



Brian Quinn

Chief Justice



Do not publish.

1. The appropriate vehicle for seeking an out-of-time appeal from a final felony conviction is by writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005).

="BR1">

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stephaine Espinosa v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephaine-espinosa-v-state-texapp-2006.