Stenzel v. D'Agostino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stenzel v. D'Agostino

50 A.D.2d 1066, 376 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12080

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1066 (Stenzel v. D'Agostino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stenzel v. D'Agostino, 50 A.D.2d 1066, 376 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner testified that she had sexual intercourse with no one except respondent after her last menstrual period in February, 1970 and the baby was two weeks overdue when born on December 6, 1970. This was well within the normal period of gestation. Respondent admitted having sexual relations with petitioner two or three times a week over an extended period of time but denied having sexual intercourse with her during February, 1970. The issue was solely one of credibility and the decision of the Family Court was properly supported by the clear and convincing evidence required in paternity cases (see W v D, 37 AD2d 904; Hopkins v Mabee, 36 AD2d 897). (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court in paternity proceeding.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner testified that she had sexual intercourse with no one except respondent after her last menstrual period in February, 1970 and the baby was two weeks overdue when born on December 6, 1970. This was well within the normal period of gestation. Respondent admitted having sexual relations with petitioner two or three times a week over an extended period of time but denied having sexual intercourse with her during February, 1970. The issue was solely one of credibility and the decision of the Family Court was properly supported by the clear and convincing evidence required in paternity cases (see W v D, 37 AD2d 904; Hopkins v Mabee, 36 AD2d 897). (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court in paternity proceeding.) Present — Moule, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1066, 376 N.Y.S.2d 274, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stenzel-v-dagostino-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack