Stenzel v. Brodie

263 A.D. 792, 32 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953

This text of 263 A.D. 792 (Stenzel v. Brodie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stenzel v. Brodie, 263 A.D. 792, 32 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party and motion granted, without costs. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The order denies a motion by defendant Maier to sever the action and for separate trial of issues as to him.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D. 792, 32 N.Y.S.2d 109, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stenzel-v-brodie-nyappdiv-1941.