Stenzel v. Best Buy Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Stenzel v. Best Buy Co.

909 N.W.2d 255, 501 Mich. 1042

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedApril 4, 2018

DocketSC: 156262; COA: 328804

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 909 N.W.2d 255 (Stenzel v. Best Buy Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stenzel v. Best Buy Co., 909 N.W.2d 255, 501 Mich. 1042 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2016 and June 27, 2017 judgments of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether the Court of Appeals special panel correctly held that there is a conflict between MCL 600.2957(2) and MCR 2.112(K) ; (2) whether, in any event, a party may amend a complaint upon receipt of a notice of nonparty fault without first filing a motion to amend; and (3) if so, whether the amendment relates back to the date the complaint was filed. The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs *256amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2016 and June 27, 2017 judgments of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether the Court of Appeals special panel correctly held that there is a conflict between MCL 600.2957(2) and MCR 2.112(K) ; (2) whether, in any event, a party may amend a complaint upon receipt of a notice of nonparty fault without first filing a motion to amend; and (3) if so, whether the amendment relates back to the date the complaint was filed. The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs *256amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

909 N.W.2d 255, 501 Mich. 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stenzel-v-best-buy-co-mich-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack