Stent v. Continental National Bank
5 Abb. N. Cas. 88
This text of 5 Abb. N. Cas. 88 (Stent v. Continental National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stent v. Continental National Bank, 5 Abb. N. Cas. 88 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).
Opinion
Under the old code the mode of pleading allowed an answer positively denying, when in fact that denial was simply on information, and so the verification could show. I do not understand the code as it now stands as allowing such a verification, and therefore, the denial on information must be in the answer, and so stated.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Macauley v. Bromell & Barkley Printing Co.
67 How. Pr. 252 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1884)
Clark v. Dillon
15 Abb. N. Cas. 261 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 Abb. N. Cas. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stent-v-continental-national-bank-nysupct-1877.