Stenstrom v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stenstrom v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 12, 2025

Docket1D2024-2773

StatusPublished

This text of Stenstrom v. Dixon (Stenstrom v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stenstrom v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-2773 _____________________________

PATRICK H. STENSTROM,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction.

February 12, 2025

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Perez v. Jones, 174 So. 3d 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (holding that an appeal from the denial of a petition for writ of mandamus is civil in nature and therefore not subject to a petition for belated appeal brought under rule 9.141(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure).

LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Patrick H. Stenstrom, pro se, Petitioner.

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI