Stenquist v. Boise Cascade Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Stenquist v. Boise Cascade Corp.

224 N.W.2d 520, 302 Minn. 551, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1215

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 1974·No. No. 44683·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The employer seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding benefits to respondent, widow of the deceased employee. Employer challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the commission’s finding that the employee received an injury in the course of his employment which caused him to suffer a fatal heart attack.

Because we cannot hold that the determinative finding that employee’s injury arose out of his employment is unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted, we affirm.

Attorneys fees in the amount of $350 are allowed respondent on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The employer seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding benefits to respondent, widow of the deceased employee. Employer challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the commission’s finding that the employee received an injury in the course of his employment which caused him to suffer a fatal heart attack.

Because we cannot hold that the determinative finding that employee’s injury arose out of his employment is unsupported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted, we affirm.

Attorneys fees in the amount of $350 are allowed respondent on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Stenquist v. Boise Cascade Corp., 224 N.W.2d 520, 302 Minn. 551, 1974 Minn. LEXIS 1215 (Mich. 1974).

Pincite

224 N.W.2d 520 (Stenquist v. Boise Cascade Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.