Stennie v. Leven Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stennie v. Leven Realty Co.

44 A.D.2d 799, 355 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5060

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 9, 1974·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 23, 1973, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial-granted solely -on the issue of damages, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, unless the plaintiffs-respondents within 20 days of service upon them by the defendant-appellant of a copy of the order entered herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdicts, and to the entry of an amended-judgment, as follows: For Mary Stennie — $60,000; For Paul Stennie:—$15,000. -If the plaintiffs-respondents consent to the reductions, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive and a judgment exceeding the amounts indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur— Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 23, 1973, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial-granted solely -on the issue of damages, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to abide the event, unless the plaintiffs-respondents within 20 days of service upon them by the defendant-appellant of a copy of the order entered herein, with notice of entry, serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdicts, and to the entry of an amended-judgment, as follows: For Mary Stennie — $60,000; For Paul Stennie:—$15,000. -If the plaintiffs-respondents consent to the reductions, the judgment as so amended and reduced is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The amounts awarded by the jury were excessive and a judgment exceeding the amounts indicated is not warranted on this record. Concur— Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Stennie v. Leven Realty Co., 44 A.D.2d 799, 355 N.Y.S.2d 1007, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5060 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

44 A.D.2d 799 (Stennie v. Leven Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.