Stennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Stennett v. State

240 S.W.2d 312

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 6, 1951

DocketNo. 25337

StatusPublished

This text of 240 S.W.2d 312 (Stennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stennett v. State, 240 S.W.2d 312 (Tex. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of indecent exposure to a child, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of two years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. 'In the absence thereof, no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of indecent exposure to a child, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of two years.

The indictment and all other matters of procedure appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. 'In the absence thereof, no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 S.W.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stennett-v-state-texcrimapp-1951.