Stennett v. State

128 S.W. 616, 59 Tex. Crim. 262, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 281
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 11, 1910
DocketNo. 593.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 S.W. 616 (Stennett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stennett v. State, 128 S.W. 616, 59 Tex. Crim. 262, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 281 (Tex. 1910).

Opinion

RAMSEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Shelby County on the 31st day of October of last year on a charge of aggravated assault committed upon Mrs. D. A. Moore, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $35.

The facts in this case are almost idéntical to those in the case of Johnson v. State, this day decided. There was, however, in this case no exception to the court’s charge as there 'was in the Johnson case, and no complaint of same at all by any exception; nor indeed was same complained of in motion for new trial. The sole ground of the motion is that the verdict is contrary to and unsupported by the evidence. Before we would be justified in reversing a misdemeanor case the charge of the court must be excepted to and a correct special charge requested covering the matter complained of by the exception. As presented in this record there is no question for which we would be authorized to reverse the case.

The evidence is amply sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wagoner v. State
140 S.W. 339 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.W. 616, 59 Tex. Crim. 262, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stennett-v-state-texcrimapp-1910.