Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr.

479 F. App'x 137
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 18, 2012·No. 09-73832·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Stenly Laloan Rantung, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

Rantung’s only argument is that his case should be remanded for the agency to assess his withholding of removal claim *138 under the disfavored group analysis. We reject Rantung’s argument in light of our prior decision, Rantung v. Mukasey, 291 Fed.Appx. 859, (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2008), in which this court applied the disfavored group analysis to Rantung’s withholding of removal claim and rejected his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr., 479 F. App'x 137 (9th Cir. 2012).

479 F. App'x 137 (Stenly Rantung v. Eric Holder, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rantung v. Mukasey
291 F. App'x 859 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)