Stenicka v. Thomas
This text of 32 N.W.2d 220 (Stenicka v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon this appeal the members of the court are equally divided. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fritz, and Mr. Justice Fairchild are of the view that the trial court’s findings of fact are not against the great *542 weight'and clear preponderance of the evidence and that therefore the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Wick-hem, Mr. Justice Barlow, and Mr. Justice Hughes are of the contrary view and are in favor of reversal of the judgment. This situation necessarily results in the affirmance of the Judgment. Zohrlaut v. Mengelberg, 148 Wis. 592, 134 N. W. 1135; Carpenter Baking Co. v. Bakery Union, 238 Wis. 367, 299 N. W. 30, 300 N. W. 225.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 N.W.2d 220, 252 Wis. 541, 1948 Wisc. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stenicka-v-thomas-wis-1948.