Stengel v. Morehead

194 Misc. 1027, 88 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2185
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 10, 1949·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having entered into possession with permission of the one entitled to possession, respondent is not a squatter or intruder within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Williams v. Alt, 226 N. Y. 283; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 Misc. 367.) Birdie Management Corp. v. Dunton (60 N. Y. S. 2d 673) is distinguishable, as there the [1026] decision was based upon an unlawful entry. Failure to obtain a certificate from the city rent commission authorizing institution of this proceeding also required dismissal of the petition.

The final order should be affirmed, without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding upon obtaining certificate of eviction from city housing commission.

Hammeb and Heoht, JJ., concur; Edeb, J., concurs in result.

Final order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stengel v. Morehead, 194 Misc. 1027, 88 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2185 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

194 Misc. 1027 (Stengel v. Morehead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S. C. J. Realty Corp. v. Williams
67 Misc. 2d 904 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1971)
Cammarata v. Fuller
9 Misc. 2d 61 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
Stephen Estates, Inc. v. Kaplan
198 Misc. 948 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1950)