Stengel v. Morehead
This text of 194 Misc. 1027 (Stengel v. Morehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Having entered into possession with permission of the one entitled to possession, respondent is not a squatter or intruder within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (Williams v. Alt, 226 N. Y. 283; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 Misc. 367.) Birdie Management Corp. v. Dunton (60 N. Y. S. 2d 673) is distinguishable, as there the [1026]*1026decision was based upon an unlawful entry. Failure to obtain a certificate from the city rent commission authorizing institution of this proceeding also required dismissal of the petition.
The final order should be affirmed, without prejudice to the institution of a new proceeding upon obtaining certificate of eviction from city housing commission.
Hammeb and Heoht, JJ., concur; Edeb, J., concurs in result.
Final order affirmed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 Misc. 1027, 88 N.Y.S.2d 779, 1949 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stengel-v-morehead-nyappterm-1949.