Stenerson v. City of Kalispell

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 1982
Docket82-126
StatusPublished

This text of Stenerson v. City of Kalispell (Stenerson v. City of Kalispell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stenerson v. City of Kalispell, (Mo. 1982).

Opinion

No. 82-126 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1982

CHARLES STENERSON and F. W. SCHMIDT, joint venturers the name of STENERSON & SCHMIDT, Co-Partners,

Plaintiffs and Respondents,

THE CITY OF KALISPELL, Defendant and Respondent, GLACIER NATIONAL BANK, Claimant and Respondent, COLONIAL TERRACE ASSOCIATES, Claimant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, In and for the County of Flathead Honorable J. M. Salansky, Judge presiding. Counsel of Record: For Plaintiffs: James A. Cumrning, Columbia Falls, Montana For Defendant: Merritt N. Warden, Kalispell, Montana For Claimant: Chris G. McEwan, Columbia Falls, Montana For Appellant: Worden, Thane & Haines; Ronald A, Bender, Missoula, Montana

- - -

Submitted on briefs: July 15, 1982 Decided: September 2, 1982

- Filed: d. p C' k. - 2 1982

I/ # - Y " Clerk Mr. J u s t i c e J o h n C. Harrison delivered t h e f o l l o w i n g O p i n i o n of the Court.

This appeal involves two competing creditors to F.W.

Schmidt's portion of a judgment obtained from the City of

Kalispell . The D i s t r i c t C o u r t of the Eleventh J u d i c i a l District

i n F l a t h e a d C o u n t y o r d e r e d t h e a l l o c a t i o n of t h e judgment be p a i d

first to Glacier National Bank to satisfy its claim and the

b a l a n c e p a i d t o C o l o n i a l T e r r a c e Associates. Appellant, Colonial

Terrace Associates, appeals the determination of priority.

T h i s a c t i o n , as w i l l be n o t e d f u r t h e r i n t h i s o p i n i o n , is o n e

of two a c t i o n s now b e f o r e t h i s C o u r t i n v o l v i n g j u d g m e n t s of two

District Courts concerning construction work done by the

appellant. In the other case, Schmidt et al. v. Colonial

Terrace, now on a p p e a l from t h e F i r s t J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t of the

State of Montana, the appellants are appealing a judgment of

$128 ,278 , p l u s i n t e r e s t , c o s t s and a t t o r n e y f e e s . A supersedeas

bond has been filed for this amount in the District Court.

I n addition, t h i s Court is c a l l e d upon t o d e c i d e t h e issue

r a i s e d w i t h o n l y t h e b r i e f s of a p p e l l a n t . The r e s p o n d e n t s waived

f i l i n g o f b r i e f s i n t h e case.

I n April of 1 9 7 5 , S t e n e r s o n and S c h m i d t c o n t r a c t e d w i t h t h e

C i t y of K a l i s p e l l t o do work a t t h e B u f f a l o H i l l s G o l f Course.

When t h e c i t y r e f u s e d t o p a y f o r work w h i c h had b e e n c o m p l e t e d b u t n o t computed i n t o t h e b i d p r i c e , S t e n e r s o n and S c h m i d t f i l e d

suit in Flathead County. Following judgment and appeal, on

June 30, 1981, t h i s C o u r t remanded the case to F l a t h e a d C o u n t y w i t h o r d e r s t o e n t e r judgment i n f a v o r of S t e n e r s o n and S c h m i d t

in the amount of $28,359.21 plus interest (the Kalispell

j udgment ) . Just prior to the Kalispell judgment, on June 22, 1982,

Colonial Terrace Associates obtained a judgment (the Helena

judgment) , against F.W. Schmidt, Leonard Knutson and Roberta

Knutson in the amount of $128 , 2 7 8 , plus interest, costs and

attorney's fees in the District Court of the First Judicial D i s t r i c t o f t h e S t a t e o f Montana, i n and f o r t h e County of L e w i s

and Clark. A transcript of the Helena judgment was f i l e d in

M i s s o u l a C o u n t y on J u n e 23, 1 9 8 1 , and i n F l a t h e a d C o u n t y on J u n e

24, 1981. On J u l y 2 , 1 9 8 1 , C o l o n i a l f i l e d a w r i t of e x e c u t i o n i n

Flathead County. On the same d a y , J u l y 2, 1981, F.W. Schmidt

individually executed a note in the amount of $10,532.79 to

G l a c i e r N a t i o n a l Bank d u e December 29, 1 9 8 1 . G l a c i e r and S c h m i d t

signed a security a g r e e m e n t which describes the collateral as

assignment of funds from the City of Kalispell.

On J u l y 10, 1981, the City of Kalispell delivered to the

clerk of court of Flathead County the sum of $37,788.76 in

exchange for a satisfaction of judgment in the Kalispell

judgment. The f u n d s were d e p o s i t e d w i t h t h e c l e r k of c o u r t w i t h

instructions to hold subject to further instructions . On J u l y 2 2 , 1 9 8 1 , C o l o n i a l ' s w r i t of e x e c u t i o n was r e t u r n e d

i n d i c a t i n g t h a t a l l m o n i e s due F.W. S c h m i d t had b e e n p a i d t o t h e

District Court of F l a t h e a d County. On J u l y 23, 1981, Colonial

f i l e d a p e t i t i o n f o r a c h a r g i n g o r d e r i n M i s s o u l a County w h i c h is

the principal place of business of the Stenerson and Schmidt

partnership and where the partners reside. On that same d a y , J u d g e Green of the Fourth J u d i c i a l District i n M i s s o u l a County

issued the charging order pursuant to section 35-10-505, MCA.

The o r d e r c h a r g e s t h e i n t e r e s t o f F.W. Schmidt i n t h e p a r t n e r s h i p

of S t e n e r s o n and S c h m i d t and o r d e r e d any proceeds t h a t Schmidt

m i g h t r e c e i v e f r o m t h e K a l i s p e l l judgment be used t o t h e H e l e n a

judgment i n f a v o r of C o l o n i a l .

The Flathead District Court ordered t h a t the a l l o c a t i o n of

t h e K a l i s p e l l judgment t o F.W. S c h m i d t be r e t a i n e d by t h e c l e r k

of court i n F l a t h e a d C o u n t y and t h a t G l a c i e r and C o l o n i a l file

claims and proof of priority. Glacier filed its claim on

September 3, 1 9 8 1 , and C o l o n i a l filed i t s claim o n S e p t e m b e r 4 ,

1981.

On September 3, 1981, Schmidt, et al., filed a notice of

a p p e a l i n t h e H e l e n a j u d g m e n t and a s k e d f o r a s t a y o f execution p u r s u a n t t o Rule 7 , M.R.App.Civ.P. On O c t o b e r 6 , 1 9 8 1 , S c h m i d t

filed a supersedeas bond equal to the amount of the Helena

judgment. On November 3 , 1 9 8 1 , J u d g e Meloy of t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t

of the First Judicial District i n H e l e n a d i s s o l v e d t h e s t a y of

execution. Upon application to t h i s C o u r t i t was a g a i n s t a y e d

and ordered stayed until further order of this Court.

On December 11, 1 9 8 1 , t h e D i s t r i c t Court i n F l a t h e a d County

o r d e r e d S c h m i d t ' s a l l o c a t i o n of t h e K a l i s p e l l judgment be p a i d to

G l a c i e r N a t i o n a l Bank, w i t h t h e b a l a n c e p a i d , i f any, t o Colonial

T e r r a c e Associates. Colonial Terrace Associates appeals.

Appellant r a i s e s seven i s s u e s f o r review. The s u b s t a n c e of

those issues is w h e t h e r t h e District C o u r t ' s o r d e r of priority

w a s erroneous.

Pursuant t o R u l e 7 ( a ) , M.R.App.Civ.P., a n a p p e l l a n t may be

g r a n t e d a s t a y o f e x e c u t i o n of j u d g m e n t on a p p e a l i f t h e D i s t r i c t

Court approves of appellant's supersedeas bond. Rule 6(a)

M.R.App.Civ.P., requires the bond be executed by at least two securities. Here, S c h m i d t d i d p r e s e n t t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t w i t h a

supersedeas bond which met the requirements of Rule 6(a),

M.R.App.Civ.P., on October 6 , 1981. Although t h e District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stenerson v. City of Kalispell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stenerson-v-city-of-kalispell-mont-1982.