Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Stendardo v. Steinfeldt

Stendardo v. Steinfeldt

105 A.D.2d 1160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21294
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1984
StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 1160 (Stendardo v. Steinfeldt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stendardo v. Steinfeldt, 105 A.D.2d 1160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly dismissed the petition for failure to join a necessary party (see Matter ofMcGoey v Black, 100 AD2d 635, 636; cf. Matter ofWohl v Miller, 63 NY2d 687). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Finnerty, J. — Election Law, § 16-102.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and O’Donnell, JJ. (Decided Oct. 16, 1984.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF WOHL v. Miller
468 N.E.2d 1110 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
McGoey v. Black
100 A.D.2d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.2d 1160, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stendardo-v-steinfeldt-nyappdiv-1984.