Stemen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stemen v. State

268 So. 3d 694

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 2019

DocketCASE NO.: 2D19-1287

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 694 (Stemen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stemen v. State, 268 So. 3d 694 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance, such as by filing a motion to hear and rule, before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State. 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Additionally, any future petitions similar to the present petition must demonstrate service on the Attorney General at 3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida, 33607.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance, such as by filing a motion to hear and rule, before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State. 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Additionally, any future petitions similar to the present petition must demonstrate service on the Attorney General at 3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida, 33607.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stemen-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack