Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie

146 A.D.2d 632, 536 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 430

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 17, 1989

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 146 A.D.2d 632 (Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie, 146 A.D.2d 632, 536 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated July 9, 1987, as granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The period of limitations ran from the date the certificate of occupancy was issued, not from the date the defective condition was discovered (General Municipal Law § 50-i; Klein v City of Yonkers, 53 NY2d 1011). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated July 9, 1987, as granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The period of limitations ran from the date the certificate of occupancy was issued, not from the date the defective condition was discovered (General Municipal Law § 50-i; Klein v City of Yonkers, 53 NY2d 1011). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 A.D.2d 632, 536 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stelman-v-town-of-poughkeepsie-nyappdiv-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack