Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie

146 A.D.2d 632, 536 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 430
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 17, 1989·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated July 9, 1987, as granted that branch of the defendants’ cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint as time barred pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-i.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The period of limitations ran from the date the certificate of occupancy was issued, not from the date the defective condition was discovered (General Municipal Law § 50-i; Klein v City of Yonkers, 53 NY2d 1011). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Rubin, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie, 146 A.D.2d 632, 536 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 430 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

146 A.D.2d 632 (Stelman v. Town of Poughkeepsie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grimaldi v. City of Tonawanda
275 A.D.2d 917 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Merritt v. Hooshang Construction, Inc.
216 A.D.2d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Magaldino v. Town of Hurley
177 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Myers v. L & M Developers
172 A.D.2d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)