Stellrecht v. State

523 So. 2d 171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 766, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1988 WL 30432
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 25, 1988
DocketNo. BS-493
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 So. 2d 171 (Stellrecht v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stellrecht v. State, 523 So. 2d 171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 766, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1988 WL 30432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing correctly points out that the Florida Supreme Court in Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), receded from its prior decision in Rotenberry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1985) and held that a defendant cannot be simultaneously convicted of sale and possession of drugs, in addition to trafficking in such drugs, because trafficking necessarily encompasses either or both of the other offenses. Therefore, appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, the opinion filed February 3,1988, is withdrawn, appellant’s convictions and sentences for sale and possession of cocaine are set aside, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the conviction for trafficking in cocaine. See Campbell v. State, 517 So.2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hurtado v. State
533 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 So. 2d 171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 766, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1988 WL 30432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stellrecht-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.