Stellrecht v. State

523 So. 2d 171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 766, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1988 WL 30432
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 25, 1988·No. No. BS-493·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing correctly points out that the Florida Supreme Court in Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla.1987), receded from its prior decision in Rotenberry v. State, 468 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1985) and held that a defendant cannot be simultaneously convicted of sale and possession of drugs, in addition to trafficking in such drugs, because trafficking necessarily encompasses either or both of the other offenses. Therefore, appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, the opinion filed February 3,1988, is withdrawn, appellant’s convictions and sentences for sale and possession of cocaine are set aside, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the conviction for trafficking in cocaine. See Campbell v. State, 517 So.2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stellrecht v. State, 523 So. 2d 171, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 766, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2373, 1988 WL 30432 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

523 So. 2d 171 (Stellrecht v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hurtado v. State
533 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)