Stellman v. Bushey

Oregon Supreme Court

Stellman v. Bushey

138 P. 256, 69 Or. 124, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 320

Oregon Supreme Court·Decided February 3, 1914·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit to enjoin the County Court of Marion County from declaring the result of a local option election in the City of Salem. The questions involved are similar to those presented in Wiley v. Reasoner, [125] ante, p. 103 (138 Pac. 250), just decided. Every question raised by this appeal is disposed of by tbe opinion in the latter case, and reference is made to that opinion as controlling in tbis case.

Tbe decree is reversed. Reversed.

Mr. Justice Burnett dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Eakin

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit to enjoin the County Court of Marion County from declaring the result of a local option election in the City of Salem. The questions involved are similar to those presented in Wiley v. Reasoner, [125] ante, p. 103 (138 Pac. 250), just decided. Every question raised by this appeal is disposed of by tbe opinion in the latter case, and reference is made to that opinion as controlling in tbis case.

Tbe decree is reversed. Reversed.

Mr. Justice Burnett dissents.

Stellman v. Bushey, 138 P. 256, 69 Or. 124, 1914 Ore. LEXIS 320 (Or. 1914).

Pincite

138 P. 256 (Stellman v. Bushey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related