Stellmacher v. Union Mortgage Loan Co.

219 N.W. 343, 195 Wis. 635, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 182
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMay 8, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 219 N.W. 343 (Stellmacher v. Union Mortgage Loan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stellmacher v. Union Mortgage Loan Co., 219 N.W. 343, 195 Wis. 635, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 182 (Wis. 1928).

Opinion

Rosenberry, J.

A number of questions are raised. We shall deal with only one. Sec. 278.04, Stats., relating to foreclosure of mortgages, provides:

“In all such actions the plaintiff may in -his complaint unite with his claim for a foreclosure and sale a demand for judgment for any deficiency which may remain due to the [637]*637plaintiff after sale of the mortgaged premises against every party who may be personally liable for the debt secured by the mortgage, whether the mortgagor or other persons, if upon the same contract which the mortgage is given to secure; and judgment of foreclosure and sale, and also for any such deficiency, . . . may in such case be rendered.”

It is clearly and definitely settled that at common law no personal liability could be enforced in an action to foreclose a mortgage and it can be now enforced only as provided by statute. Marling v. Maynard, 129 Wis. 580, 109 N. W. 537.

It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the liability of the Union Mortgage Loan Company if any is not upon the same contract which the mortgage was given to secure. Therefore the court had no authority to render judgment in this case against the Union Mortgage Loan Company. Furthermore, the pleadings do not support the judgment, and unless the judgment is supported by the pleadings it cannot stand. Fifield v. Marinette County, 62 Wis. 532, 22 N. W. 705. See Good v. Schiltz, ante, p. 481, 218 N. W. 727.

We do not find it necessary to consider other questions raised.

By the Court.- — Judgment for deficiency against the Union Mortgage Loan Company is reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank Mutual v. S.J. Boyer Construction, Inc.
2010 WI 74 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2010)
Glover v. Marine Bank of Beaver Dam
345 N.W.2d 449 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1984)
Milwaukee County v. Schmidt
156 N.W.2d 493 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1968)
Shea v. National Bank of De Pere
250 N.W. 424 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1933)
Westboro Lumber Co. v. Schwenker
226 N.W. 313 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 N.W. 343, 195 Wis. 635, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stellmacher-v-union-mortgage-loan-co-wis-1928.