Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck
113 N.J.L. 397
Opinion
The judgment herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Perskie.
We deem it necessary to say only that there was evidence tending to show that the infant plaintiff was upon the premises by invitation, and that there was a breach of the duty owing to him by the defendant under the circumstances.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teeh•ohaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiiee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, IIeteieud, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.
For reversal — FTone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck, 113 N.J.L. 397 (N.J. 1934).
113 N.J.L. 397 (Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.