Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck

113 N.J.L. 397

DecidedSeptember 27, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 113 N.J.L. 397 (Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stellakis ex rel. Stellakis v. Hasbrouck, 113 N.J.L. 397 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cuela m.

The judgment herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Perskie.

We deem it necessary to say only that there was evidence tending to show that the infant plaintiff was upon the premises by invitation, and that there was a breach of the duty owing to him by the defendant under the circumstances.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teeh•ohaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiiee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, IIeteieud, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — FTone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cuela m.

The judgment herein will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the Supreme Court by Mr. Justice Perskie.

We deem it necessary to say only that there was evidence tending to show that the infant plaintiff was upon the premises by invitation, and that there was a breach of the duty owing to him by the defendant under the circumstances.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chiee Justice, Teeh•ohaed, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiiee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, IIeteieud, Deae, Wells, JJ. 12.

For reversal — FTone.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 N.J.L. 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stellakis-ex-rel-stellakis-v-hasbrouck-nj-1934.