Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron v. Atascocita Forest Community

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 16, 2023
Docket01-22-00962-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron v. Atascocita Forest Community (Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron v. Atascocita Forest Community) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron v. Atascocita Forest Community, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued May 16, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00962-CV ——————————— STELLA SALMERON AND CARLOS SALMERON, Appellants V. ATASCOCITA FOREST COMMUNITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 165th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-14619

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron, are attempting to appeal

from a judgment signed on September 16, 2022. Because we conclude that we lack

jurisdiction in this appeal, we dismiss. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the judgment is signed.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. This deadline may be extended to 90 days after the

judgment is signed if a timely post-judgment motion is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.1(a). A post-judgment motion is timely filed if it is filed within 30 days after the

judgment is signed. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a).

Appellants did not file a timely post-judgment motion. Appellants filed a

“Motion to Relief,” challenging the judgment on December 15, 2022. Appellants

also filed a notice of appeal on December 15, 2022.1 Because the post-judgment

motion was not filed within 30 days of the date the judgment was signed, it was not

timely filed and did not extend the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 26.1(a). Thus, the notice of appeal was due within 30 days after the

judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellants filed their notice of

appeal more than 90 days after the judgment was signed, and therefore, the notice of

appeal was not timely filed. Absent a timely-filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks

jurisdiction over the appeal. See In the Interest of K.A.F., A Child, 160 S.W.3d 923,

928 (Tex. 2005).

1 Appellants filed a notice of appeal in this Court on December 15, 2022. They filed their notice of appeal in the trial court on December 22, 2022. “If a notice of appeal is mistakenly filed with the appellate court, the notice is deemed to have been filed the same day with the trial court clerk, and the appellate clerk must immediately send the trial court clerk a copy of the notice.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(a). 2 On April 11, 2023, this Court issued a notice to appellants, advising them that

this Court might lack jurisdiction and that the Court might dismiss their appeal

unless appellants filed a response by April 21, 2023, establishing this Court’s

jurisdiction. Appellants filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Interest of K.A.F.
160 S.W.3d 923 (Texas Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stella Salmeron and Carlos Salmeron v. Atascocita Forest Community, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stella-salmeron-and-carlos-salmeron-v-atascocita-forest-community-texapp-2023.