Stella C. Davis v. John Edgar Hoover
Opinion
Plaintiff appeared in the District Court and here, pro se. She has commenced and conducted much litigation in the federal and state courts, asserting various claims of fraud, conspiracy, legal chicanery, etc. See Davis v. Foreman, 7 Cir., 239 F.2d 579; Davis v. Foreman, 7 Cir., 251 F.2d 421; Daviditis v. National Bank of Mattoon, 7 Cir., 251 F.2d 299, and Daviditis v. National Bank of Mattoon, 7 Cir., 262 F.2d 884.
In the instant case, the District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and that the complaint filed failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We think the District Court was correct.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
346 F.2d 567 (Stella C. Davis v. John Edgar Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.