Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski

11 A.D.2d 695, 204 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9459

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 695 (Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stell Realty Corp. v. Plonski, 11 A.D.2d 695, 204 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination -of the Zoning Board of Appeals of ■the Town of Huntington, denying petitioner’s application for a special exception to use certain property as a gasoline service station and public garage, the Zoning Board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk .County, entered January 5-, 1960, which annulled the board’s determination and which directed the issuance of -a special use permit. Order reversed on •the law -and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. Findings of fact ■contained in tiie opinion of the Special Term, insofar as such findings are inconsistent herewith, are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The record contains substantial .evidence to support -the determination .of the board that petitioner had failed ito sustain its burden of proving that the proposed use would not cause any undue traffic hazards, and would not impair the character of .the neighborhood or adversely affect property values. Rolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination -of the Zoning Board of Appeals of ■the Town of Huntington, denying petitioner’s application for a special exception to use certain property as a gasoline service station and public garage, the Zoning Board appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk .County, entered January 5-, 1960, which annulled the board’s determination and which directed the issuance of -a special use permit. Order reversed on •the law -and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed. Findings of fact ■contained in tiie opinion of the Special Term, insofar as such findings are inconsistent herewith, are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. The record contains substantial .evidence to support -the determination .of the board that petitioner had failed ito sustain its burden of proving that the proposed use would not cause any undue traffic hazards, and would not impair the character of .the neighborhood or adversely affect property values. Rolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ.. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 695, 204 N.Y.S.2d 661, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stell-realty-corp-v-plonski-nyappdiv-1960.