Steliga v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York
176 A. 192, 114 N.J.L. 156, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 198
This text of 176 A. 192 (Steliga v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steliga v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York, 176 A. 192, 114 N.J.L. 156, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1935).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Lloyd in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Yah Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A. 192, 114 N.J.L. 156, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steliga-v-metropolitan-casualty-ins-co-of-new-york-nj-1935.