Stelber Cycle Corp. v. United States

62 Cust. Ct. 1059, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3420
United States Customs Court·Decided January 6, 1969·No. No. P69/4; protests 328260-K, etc. (New York); No. P69/5; protests 60/3210,etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A”, covered by the foregoing protests, consist of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285); that the items of merchandise marked “B”, consist of rim strips or rim tapes or rim bands or flaps; that said merchandise is composed of synthetic rubber of the butyl type and contains over 20 percent free carbon by weight; and that said merchandise is not dedicated to use with bicycles but is commercially used as parts of other articles such as delivery tricycles, motorized bicycles, adult tricycles, and other three-wheeled vehicles, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stelber Cycle Corp. v. United States, 62 Cust. Ct. 1059, 1969 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3420 (cusc 1969).

62 Cust. Ct. 1059 (Stelber Cycle Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seedman International Corp. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 127 (U.S. Customs Court, 1968)