Stelber Cycle Corp. v. United States
This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 673 (Stelber Cycle Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A”, covered by the foregoing protests, consist of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Seedman International Corp. et al. v. United States (60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285) ; that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of rim strips or rim tapes or rim bands or flaps; that said merchandise is composed of synthetic rubber of the butyl type and contains over 20 percent free carbon by weight; and that said merchandise is not dedi[674]*674cated to use witb bicycles, but is commercially used as parts of other articles such as delivery tricycles, motorized bicycles, adult tricycles, and other three-wheeled vehicles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Cust. Ct. 673, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stelber-cycle-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1968.