Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.

1954 OK 157, 273 P.2d 879, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 599
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 18, 1954·No. No. 35631·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAVISON, Justice.

Except that this case is prosecuted for the use and benefit of the defendant Ritz Theatre, Inc., rather than Majestic Amusement Company, it is identical, as to parties, facts, and law, to cause Number 35,630, 273 P.2d 872, this day decided. Therefore, the opinion in said cause Number 35,630 is hereby adopted as the opinión herein.

Judgment is affirmed.

HALLEY, ,'C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, O’NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur. :

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc., 1954 OK 157, 273 P.2d 879, 1954 Okla. LEXIS 599 (Okla. 1954).

1954 OK 157 (Steinway v. Griffith Consolidated Theatres, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Charters
293 P.2d 778 (California Supreme Court, 1956)
Security-First National Bank v. Yeakel
293 P.2d 778 (California Supreme Court, 1956)