Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey

379 F.2d 554
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJuly 25, 1967
Docket16204
StatusPublished

This text of 379 F.2d 554 (Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey, 379 F.2d 554 (3d Cir. 1967).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case plaintiff appellants sought injunctive relief below against the enforcement of a United States Post Office Department Order, intercepting plaintiffs’ mail for fraudulent violation of Title 39 U.S.C.A. § 4005.

The District Court, after extensive hearing, entered an Order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Arlton Pilling, Postmaster at Woodbury, New Jersey, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 238 (D.C.N.J. 1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stein's v. Pilling
256 F. Supp. 238 (D. New Jersey, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 F.2d 554, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steins-steins-mfg-co-and-lou-stein-pc-v-arlton-pilling-ca3-1967.