Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey

Third Circuit

Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey

379 F.2d 554

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 25, 1967·No. 16204·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case plaintiff appellants sought injunctive relief below against the enforcement of a United States Post Office Department Order, intercepting plaintiffs’ mail for fraudulent violation of Title 39 U.S.C.A. § 4005.

The District Court, after extensive hearing, entered an Order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Arlton Pilling, Postmaster at Woodbury, New Jersey, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 238 (D.C.N.J. 1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case plaintiff appellants sought injunctive relief below against the enforcement of a United States Post Office Department Order, intercepting plaintiffs’ mail for fraudulent violation of Title 39 U.S.C.A. § 4005.

The District Court, after extensive hearing, entered an Order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee Arlton Pilling, Postmaster at Woodbury, New Jersey, and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.

On review of the record we find no error. The Order of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his opinion reported at 256 F.Supp. 238 (D.C.N.J. 1966).

Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey, 379 F.2d 554 (3d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

379 F.2d 554 (Stein's, Stein's Mfg. Co., and Lou Stein, P.C. v. Arlton Pilling, Postmaster, Woodbury, New Jersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related