Steinola Co. v. Steinway & Sons

269 F. 720, 50 App. D.C. 204, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2343
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 1921
DocketNo. 1335
StatusPublished

This text of 269 F. 720 (Steinola Co. v. Steinway & Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steinola Co. v. Steinway & Sons, 269 F. 720, 50 App. D.C. 204, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2343 (D.C. Cir. 1921).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a trade-mark opposition, in which Steinway & Sons, manufacturers of pianos, object to the registration by appellant company of the word “Steinola” as a trade-mark for phonographs. We concur in the opinion of the Commissioner of Patents sustaining the opposition.

The decision is affirmed. .

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 F. 720, 50 App. D.C. 204, 1921 U.S. App. LEXIS 2343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steinola-co-v-steinway-sons-cadc-1921.